New PIC/S recommendation for evaluating PQS effectiveness in relation to risk-based change management
On November 28, 2019 the Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-Operation Scheme (PIC/S) published a draft Recommendation for Participating Authorities, providing practical guidance for GMP inspectors, on how to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmaceutical quality system (PQS) in relation to risk-based change management.(1)
The PIC/S GMP Guide requires companies to have an effective PQS and apply quality risk management (QRM) principles to change control activities.
Chapter 1 states:
· Principle: …there must be ‘a comprehensively designed and correctly implemented Pharmaceutical Quality System incorporating Good Manufacturing Practice and Quality Risk Management. It should be fully documented and its effectiveness monitored’.
· 1.3 ...’the effectiveness of the system is normally demonstrated at the site level’.
· 1.5 ‘Senior management has the ultimate responsibility to ensure an effective Pharmaceutical Quality System is in place...’
· 1.4 (xii) Arrangements [should be] in place ‘for the prospective evaluation of planned changes and their approval prior to implementation…’
Annex 15 states:
· 11.1. ‘The control of change is an important part of knowledge management and should be handled within the pharmaceutical quality system.’
· 11.4. ‘Quality risk management should be used to evaluate planned changes… and to plan for any necessary process validation, verification or requalification efforts.’
· 11.7. ‘…an evaluation of the effectiveness of change should be carried out…’
The recommendation was prepared by the PIC/S Expert Circle on QRM and does not create any new GMP requirements or expectations. It simply provides inspectors with a tool to support an evaluation of PQS effectiveness in relation to risk-based change management. It has been designed to help inspectors increase their understanding of what risk-based change management means at a practical level, and then give a framework to help see how effective implementation might be demonstrated by pharmaceutical companies. The tool provides a checklist approach focusing on:
· Change proposals – Determination of when a change is needed
· Change risk assessments
· Change Planning and implementation
· Change review and effectiveness
The recommendation is currently a draft that is being applied on a 6-month trial basis, with an expectation that formal adoption will subsequently occur on a revised version following comments on use of the tool by PIC/S participating authorities.
Of more significance than the use of the tool by inspectors over the coming months, is that this move starts to see a shift, albeit a small one, towards greater risk-based regulatory oversight as envisaged in ICH Q10 (Pharmaceutical Quality System) and Q12 (Lifecycle Management). (2)
(1) https://www.picscheme.org/en/news
(2) https://www.ich.org/page/quality-guidelines
Related Insights
Blog
Biosimilar reference medicinal product (RMP) regulatory requirements: China, US and EU comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Playbook
Mitigating risk, protecting potential: Practical strategies that position cell and gene therapy development for success
Mar 28, 2023
Video
Cell & Gene Therapies: A Regulatory Update
Jul 22, 2022
Blog
U.S. drug price reform of 2022: What does the Inflation Reduction Act mean for drug manufacturers?
Aug 17, 2022
Article
Q&A Project Optimus: What you need to know
Oct 11, 2022
Article
Relyvrio Approval: Lessons Learned
Oct 31, 2022
Article
Five strategies for meeting the requirements of Project Optimus and improving the chances of approval
Nov 10, 2022
Playbook
Are you using real-world evidence?
Feb 1, 2023
Video
How to transition existing trials under EU-CTR
Feb 1, 2023
Webinar
How to navigate China’s regulatory environment
Feb 15, 2023
Whitepaper
The Chinese Pharmaceutical Market: Size, R&D, Regulations, Market Access and Innovations
Mar 9, 2023
Report
New Medicines, Novel Insights: Advancing rare disease drug development
May 22, 2023
Related Insights
Blog
Biosimilar reference medicinal product (RMP) regulatory requirements: China, US and EU comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Playbook
Mitigating risk, protecting potential: Practical strategies that position cell and gene therapy development for success
Mar 28, 2023
Video
Cell & Gene Therapies: A Regulatory Update
Jul 22, 2022
Blog
U.S. drug price reform of 2022: What does the Inflation Reduction Act mean for drug manufacturers?
Aug 17, 2022
Article
Q&A Project Optimus: What you need to know
Oct 11, 2022
Article
Relyvrio Approval: Lessons Learned
Oct 31, 2022
Article
Five strategies for meeting the requirements of Project Optimus and improving the chances of approval
Nov 10, 2022
Playbook
Are you using real-world evidence?
Feb 1, 2023
Video
How to transition existing trials under EU-CTR
Feb 1, 2023
Webinar
How to navigate China’s regulatory environment
Feb 15, 2023
Whitepaper
The Chinese Pharmaceutical Market: Size, R&D, Regulations, Market Access and Innovations
Mar 9, 2023
Report
New Medicines, Novel Insights: Advancing rare disease drug development
May 22, 2023